Aucoin v. Police Board of City of New Orleans
Citations
- 111 La. 745
- 35 So. 888
- 1904 La. LEXIS 556
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL—DECISIONS—EFFECT—SUBSEQUENT ACTION.</p> <p>1. Where, in a mandamus proceeding to compel the reinstatement of1 a discharged police officer, the Supreme Court found that there was error in the final vote of the police board, and that the sentence was illegal, and thereupon ordered the officer’s reinstatement, but did not consider his right to salary during the interval between his dismissal and reinstatement, the decision had no bearing on a subsequent action by the officer to recover such salary.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ALJ’s failure to discuss evidence was harmless error where the evidence did not contain any information inconsistent with the assess RFC, the record contained other sources of opinion evidence, and the opinion in question was not entitled to special weight
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Proyosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.