Auburn University v. Publish International Business Machines, Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is appropriate for this Court to determine whether the works are substantially similar and therefore, whether [p]laintiff can plausibly demonstrate entitlement to relief”
• explaining that Eleventh Circuit case law supports a trial court’s ruling based on infringement at a motion to dismiss and noting that other circuits have approved the practice of deciding the issue of substantial similarity upon a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).