Skip to main content
· 3/15/1915

Auburn Draying Co. v. Wardell

Citations

  • 89 Misc. 501
  • 152 N.Y.S. 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he amount paid is evidence of the value, but... it is not conclusive of the value as it was represented to be”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.