· 3/15/1915
Auburn Draying Co. v. Wardell
Citations
- 89 Misc. 501
- 152 N.Y.S. 475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]he amount paid is evidence of the value, but... it is not conclusive of the value as it was represented to be”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.