AUBRIS RESOURCES v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the court “consider[ed] the relationship between and among the policy, the additional insured provision in the services agreement, and the indemnity provision in the services agreement”
• observing that the court “eonsider[ed] the relationship between and among the policy, the additional insured provision in the services agreement, and the indemnity provision in the services agreement”
• seeing “no reason why the special rules of insurance policy interpretation should not apply where, as here, the insurance policy’s additional insured endorsement incorporates section 10.2 by reference[]”
• contract required contractor to name owner and affiliates “as additional insureds in each of Contractor’s policies, except W orkers’ Compensation . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).