Aubrey v. City of Cincinnati

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Cincinnati Reds’ ban on ballpark banners that are not in “good taste” is unconstitutional because the policy “leaves too much discretion in the decision maker without any standards for that decision maker to base his or her determination”
• holding that Cincinnati Reds' ban on ballpark banners that are not in \good taste\ is unconstitutional because the policy \leaves too much discretion in the decision maker without any standards for that decision maker to base his or her determination\
• holding that unfurling religious banner in stands at World Series game constituted expressive conduct
• concluding that the Cincinnati Reds’ banner policy allowing banners only if they were in “good taste” left “too much discretion in the decision maker without any standards for that decision maker to base his or her determination”
• concluding that the Cincinnati Reds’ banner policy allowing banners only if they were in “good taste” left “too much discretion in the decision maker without any standards for that decision maker to base his or her determination”
• concluding that the Cincinnati Reds’ banner policy allowing banners only if they were in “good taste” left “too much discretion in the decision maker without any standards for that decision maker to base his or her determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).