Skip to main content
· 11/26/1985

Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Citations

  • 776 F.2d 1492
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1169
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 903
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) “is a codification of a trial court’s inherent managerial power ‘to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants’” (citations omitted)
  • noting district courts enjoy broad discretion in whether to consolidate actions
  • the three letters strengthen the inference that defendants knew or should have known that users of their asbestos insulation ran a risk of contracting asbestosis
  • under Georgia law, there may be an offset for settlement amounts received from joint tortfeasors for an indivisible injury
  • amount received by spouse who settled claim for loss of consortium should not be set off against damages received at trial because \the damages sustained by a spouse are exclusive of those suffered by her husband\
  • “It is error for a trial court to submit a claim for future medical expenses to the jury if, to make an award, the jury must engage in sheer speculation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Hatchett, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.