· 11/26/1985
Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
Citations
- 776 F.2d 1492
- 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1169
- 19 Fed. R. Serv. 903
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) “is a codification of a trial court’s inherent managerial power ‘to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants’” (citations omitted)
- noting district courts enjoy broad discretion in whether to consolidate actions
- the three letters strengthen the inference that defendants knew or should have known that users of their asbestos insulation ran a risk of contracting asbestosis
- under Georgia law, there may be an offset for settlement amounts received from joint tortfeasors for an indivisible injury
- amount received by spouse who settled claim for loss of consortium should not be set off against damages received at trial because \the damages sustained by a spouse are exclusive of those suffered by her husband\
- “It is error for a trial court to submit a claim for future medical expenses to the jury if, to make an award, the jury must engage in sheer speculation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Hatchett, Garza
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.