Skip to main content
· 10/25/2012

AU Optronics Corporation v. State of South Carolina

Citations

  • 699 F.3d 385
  • 2012 WL 5265799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that states possess a quasi-sovereign interest in pursuing enforcement of consumer protection and antitrust laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Duncan, Keenan, Petitions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.