Atwood Vacuum MacHine Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that expert testimony is appropriate where parties dispute the meaning of foreign law
• stating that expert testimony is appropriate where parties dispute the meaning of foreign law
• reversing the dismissal of a complaint because “[w]e are of the opinion that the trial court should have 68 Nos. 1-12-3760, 1-13-0624, 1-13-0729 (cons.
• reversing the dismissal of a complaint because “[w]e are of the opinion that the trial court should have considered expert testimony and authorities as to the meaning of the Venezuelan statutes [at issue] before arriving at the determination” that the complaint did not state a cause of action
• reversing the dismissal of a complaint because “[w]e are of the opinion that the trial court should have considered expert testimony and authorities as to the meaning of the Venezuelan statutes [at issue] before arriving at the determination” that the complaint did not state a cause of action
• meaning of Venezuelan statutes must be proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).