· 12/15/1992
Atwood v. Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co.
Citations
- 605 N.E.2d 1032
- 239 Ill. App. 3d 81
- 179 Ill. Dec. 18
- 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 2028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that both the order requiring plaintiffs to identify their claims and causally relate them to the cause of action and the subsequent summary judgment were appropriate after five years of discovery
- in cases consolidated for discovery purposes, trial court had discretion to require plaintiffs to certify by date certain that each plaintiff's claim and its cause had been identified, and that cause had been exposure to material that was subject of cases
- in cases consolidated for discovery purposes, trial court had discretion to require plaintiffs to certify by date certain that each plaintiff’s claim and its cause had been identified, and that cause had been exposure to material that was subject of cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn, Inglis, McLAREN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.