Skip to main content
· 4/25/2003

Atwood v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. (In Re Atwood)

Citations

  • 293 B.R. 227
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 5425
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4246
  • 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 455
  • 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 93
  • 2003 WL 21204628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ciling O’Rourke v. Seaboard Sur. Co. (In re E.R. Fegert, Inc.), 887 F.2d 955, 957-58 (9th Cir.1989)
  • agreeing with Powe, and rejecting Tate, cited above in n. 11, holds proof of claim can be sufficient to claim fees under § 506(b)
  • reversing bankruptcy court whei-e it failed to make a determination of reasonableness of attorney fees awarded in cure amount
  • authorizing reviewing court to take judicial notice of pleadings docketed in the 28 bankruptcy court
  • reversing allowance of fees included in proof of claim because creditor provided nothing in proof of claim or in response to objection to claim to show reasonableness of fees
  • we are free to take judicial notice of relevant documents - 15 - 1 on the bankruptcy court’s docket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandt, Klein, Bufford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.