ATV Watch v. New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that attorney’s fees provision of Right-to-Know Law is intended to apply “when retention of legal counsel is necessary to secure access to public documents”
• “The trial court retains the discretion to decide whether to grant an injunction after consideration of the facts and established principles of equity.” (quotation omitted)
• attorney’s fees not awardable under RTK law when petitioner “was not represented by counsel until after [the agency] disclosed all the documents to which [the petitioner] was entitled”
• issuance of injunction an extraordinary remedy, and should not issue unless there is, among other things, an immediate danger of irreparable harm to the party seeking injunctive relief
• interpreting prior version of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).