ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Harper & Kemp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney’s violation of MRPC 5.5(a) was deliberate and persistent and the attorney had no reasonable basis on which he could have thought his conduct was lawful
• stating that where a lawyer “furnished his name to the enterprise[,] . . . [f]rom the standpoint of the public Kemp was Harper’s partner.”
• stating that where a lawyer “furnished his name to the enterprise[,] ... [f]rom the standpoint of the public Kemp was Harper’s partner.”
• imposing disbarment where Mr. Harper’s unauthorized practice was motivated by greed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).