Attorney Grievance Commission v. Weiers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that commingling client funds with earned fees did not violate MLRPC 1.1, under the circumstances of that case
• concluding attorney had violated MLRPC 8.1(b) when although he had responded to the AGC, he “fail[ed] to cooperate readily and fully with Bar Counsel”
• noting that an attorney’s prior grievance history constitutes part of the facts and circumstances considered in reaching an appropriate sanction
• attorney violated then Rule 16-607, now Rule 19-408 (commingling of funds), Rule 1.15(a), and Rule 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with Bar Counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).