· 4/25/2011
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Usiak
Citations
- 18 A.3d 1
- 418 Md. 667
- 2011 Md. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he evidence that was presented to the Peer Review Panel and its assessment of that evidence, is irrelevant to our review of the evidence presented at Respondent’s actual disciplinary evidentiary hearing.”
- “The judge is at liberty to pick and choose what evidence to believe and what evidence to disbelieve, as well as what weight to give (or not) to any piece of evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Adkins, Barbera
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.