Skip to main content
· 4/25/2011

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Usiak

Citations

  • 18 A.3d 1
  • 418 Md. 667
  • 2011 Md. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he evidence that was presented to the Peer Review Panel and its assessment of that evidence, is irrelevant to our review of the evidence presented at Respondent’s actual disciplinary evidentiary hearing.”
  • “The judge is at liberty to pick and choose what evidence to believe and what evidence to disbelieve, as well as what weight to give (or not) to any piece of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Murphy, Adkins, Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.