Skip to main content
· 1/17/2001

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tomaino

Citations

  • 765 A.2d 653
  • 362 Md. 483
  • 2001 Md. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the state of mind of the attorney at the time of the violation [is] ‘important in the context of mitigation’ ”
  • the state of mind of the attorney at the time of the violation is important in the context of mitigation.
  • recently reaffirming this Court’s precedent that misappropriation is inherently deceitful, thus requiring disbarment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.