Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the attorney violated MRPC 1.1 when he failed to file a Chapter 13 plan on behalf of his client, although he had filed the petition
• holding that an attorney’s conduct that included failure to communicate with a client violates his duty of competence and diligence, among others
• concluding that the respondent violated MLRPC 1.1 “by undertaking representation of [his client’s] claim although respondent recognized from the beginning that the likelihood of success with [his client’s] claim was limited” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).