· 7/19/2002
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Santos
Citations
- 803 A.2d 505
- 370 Md. 77
- 2002 Md. LEXIS 496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- imposing an indefinite suspension, with the right to apply for reinstatement after 90 days, for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.15, 1.16, 8.1(b), 8.4(d
- noting that disbarment is the preferred sanction in cases involving misappropriation but imposing an indefinite suspension because the hearing judge had concluded that the attorney’s misappropriation was not “dishonest or fraudulent or done with intent to defraud”
- noting that disbarment is the preferred sanction in cases involving misappropriation but imposing an indefinite suspension because the hearing judge had concluded that the attorney’s misappropriation was not “dishonest or fraudulent or done with intent to defraud”
- commingling client funds into operating account
- commingling client funds into operating account
- commingling client funds into operating account
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.