Skip to main content
· 7/19/2002

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Santos

Citations

  • 803 A.2d 505
  • 370 Md. 77
  • 2002 Md. LEXIS 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing an indefinite suspension, with the right to apply for reinstatement after 90 days, for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.15, 1.16, 8.1(b), 8.4(d
  • noting that disbarment is the preferred sanction in cases involving misappropriation but imposing an indefinite suspension because the hearing judge had concluded that the attorney’s misappropriation was not “dishonest or fraudulent or done with intent to defraud”
  • noting that disbarment is the preferred sanction in cases involving misappropriation but imposing an indefinite suspension because the hearing judge had concluded that the attorney’s misappropriation was not “dishonest or fraudulent or done with intent to defraud”
  • commingling client funds into operating account
  • commingling client funds into operating account
  • commingling client funds into operating account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.