Attorney Grievance Commission v. Prichard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney had violated Crim. Law § 7-113(a) by misappropriating client funds held in a fiduciary capacity, thereby establishing the criminal violation required under MLRPC 8.4(b)
• holding that an attorney had violated Crim. Law § 7-113(a) by misappropriating client funds held in a fiduciary capacity, thereby establishing the criminal violation required under MLRPC 8.4(b)
• stating that respondent violated MRPC 1.15 by “failing to hold property of clients or third persons that was in his possession in connection with a representation separate from his own property, including monetary funds which were not kept in a separate account”
• attorney’s conduct constituted a Rule 8.4(b) violation when he engaged in criminal conduct under Section 7-113 by fraudulently and willfully appropriating money he held in a fiduciary capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).