Attorney Grievance Commission v. Olszewski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sanctioning attorney with indefinite suspension for, inter alia, representing client in lawsuit against another client
• sanctioning attorney with indefinite suspension for, inter alia, representing client in lawsuit against another client
• the failure to make prompt delivery owed to a client or third person violates Md. Rule 19- 301.15(d)
• “We agree with the hearing judge that Respondent clearly violated [MARPC 19-301.4](a)(1) by failing to explain the potential conflict of interest when he undertook joint representation[.]”
• “We agree with the hearing judge that Respondent clearly violated [MARPC 19-301.4](a)(1) by failing to explain the potential conflict of interest when he undertook joint representation[.]”
• “We agree with the hearing judge that, on the facts of this case, ‘a minimal threshold of competent representation was breached when [Respondent] agreed to represent one client against another[.]’ ” (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).