Skip to main content
· 12/6/2006

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 912 A.2d 588
  • 395 Md. 676
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying an attorney’s motion to remand in a post-hearing memorandum because attorney “ ‘had ample notice of the fact that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were filed and many opportunities to review same’ ” (quoting Bar Counsel’s oppositional motion)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.