· 12/26/1989
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Montgomery
Citations
- 567 A.2d 112
- 318 Md. 154
- 1989 Md. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that multiple acts of negligent misrepresentation, unavailability to and failure to communicate with clients, and failure to withdraw from cases after being discharged warranted disbarment
- “the extent of the discipline to be applied is generally dependent upon the severity of the misconduct and the particular facts and circumstances surrounding it.”
- \the extent of the discipline to be applied is generally dependent upon the severity of the misconduct and the particular facts and circumstances surrounding it.\
- “the extent of the discipline to be applied is generally dependent upon the severity of the misconduct and the particular facts and circumstances surrounding it.”
- “[T]he extent of the discipline to be applied is generally dependent upon the severity of the misconduct and the particular facts and circumstances surrounding it.”
- “the extent of the discipline to be applied is generally dependent upon the severity of the misconduct and the particular facts and circumstances surrounding it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.