· 1/22/1998
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Milliken
Citations
- 704 A.2d 1225
- 348 Md. 486
- 1998 Md. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to respond to Bar Counsel’s letters is a violation of Rule 8.1
- stating that under Md. Rule 1.16(d), an attorney is “obligated to return any unearned portion” of an “advance fee payment”
- gross neglect of client cases, commingling of funds
- gross neglect of client cases, commingling of funds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.