Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/4/2006
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Midlen
Citations
- 911 A.2d 852
- 395 Md. 628
- 2006 Md. LEXIS 816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, absent disciplinary counsel’s recommendation for leniency, court would have considered more severe sanction as reciprocal discipline when respondent failed to notify Maryland of public discipline ordered by District of Columbia
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 98×
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-03-30· cited 88×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-02· cited 35×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-23· cited 29×
- In Re SoininenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-07-15· cited 26×
- In Re ApplerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-29· cited 23×
- In Re MidlenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-10· cited 8×
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. MarsickKentucky Supreme Court· 1999-03-25· cited 5×
- In Re O'TooleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-06-23· cited 3×
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-02-03· cited 3×
- In Re JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-24· cited 2×
- In Re KleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-02-11· cited 2×
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MalekWisconsin Supreme Court· 1995-04-28· cited 1×
- In re TuoheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-07-29· cited 1×
- In re FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-01-06· cited 1×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DruryOhio Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.