Skip to main content
· 11/8/2000

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Koven

Citations

  • 761 A.2d 881
  • 361 Md. 337
  • 2000 Md. LEXIS 682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an attorney “violated Rule 8.4(c) and (d)” when he “intentionally altered Department of Labor letters and alien certification receipts, [] created letters and faxes to mislead [a company] and its employees, and [] submitted a false billing statement”
  • concluding that an attorney “violated Rule 8.4(c) and (d
  • incompetent representation of clients, not refunding unearned fees, accepting payment for work not performed
  • incompetent representation of clients, not refunding unearned fees, accepting payment for work not performed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.