Attorney Grievance Commission v. Klarman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding absent any averment that person upon whom substitute service was made “was not ordinarily intelligent, and in full possession of [his or her] faculties,” presumption is “that [the person] was well informed, and as capable, as the ordinary [person of similar age]”
• interpreting predecessor statute to Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.03(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).