Skip to main content
· 6/8/2000

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jaseb

Citations

  • 773 A.2d 516
  • 364 Md. 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a reprimand was an appropriate sanction considering, among other factors, the attorney’s lack of prior misconduct and the lack of prejudice to the client
  • concluding that a reprimand was an appropriate sanction considering, among other factors, the attorney's lack of prior misconduct and the lack of prejudice to the client
  • concluding that a reprimand was an appropriate sanction considering, among other factors, the attorney’s lack of prior misconduct and the lack of prejudice to the client
  • in turn quoting Attorney Grievance Commission v. Glenn, 341 Md. 448, 488-89, 671 A.2d 463, 483 (1996) (citations omitted)
  • in turn quoting Attorney Grievance Commission v. Glenn, 341 Md. 448, 488-89, 671 A.2d 463, 483 (1996) (citations omitted)
  • a reprimand is an appropriate sanction considering, among other factors, the attorney's lack of prior mis-conduct and the lack of prejudice to the client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.