Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ficker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the difficulties of handling a high-volume caseload were worsened by the need to be in multiple jurisdictions across the State
• imposing an indefinite suspension, with the right to reapply after 120 days, for violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 3.4, 5.1, and 8.4(d
• attorney was not responsible for employee’s misconduct under MLRPC 5.3(c)(2) because, upon discovery of the misconduct the attorney took immediate remedial measures by stopping the misconduct, docking the employee’s pay, and refunding money to clients harmed by the employee’s misconduct
• attorney was not responsible for employee’s misconduct under MLRPC 5.3(c)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).