Attorney Grievance Commission v. Faber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing disbarment when attorney violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4(a) and (b), and 1.16(d
• rejecting the respondent’s exception that he did not receive proper service and that he was denied due process, where bar counsel demonstrated repeated attempts to serve the respondent personally and on the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland
• rejecting the respondent’s exception that he did not receive proper service and that he was denied due process, where bar counsel demonstrated repeated attempts to serve the respondent personally and on the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).