Skip to main content
· 3/9/2006

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Calhoun

Citations

  • 894 A.2d 518
  • 391 Md. 532
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that sending out monthly statements that simply stated what the client owed without providing further details was a violation of MLRPC Rule 1.4
  • finding that sending out monthly statements that simply stated what the client owed without providing further details was a violation of MLRPC Rule 1.4
  • stating that where the respondent knew that there was a dispute as to her fees arising from settlement funds, “respondent should have deposited the funds into a proper trust account pending resolution of such dispute”
  • attorney’s 10-month delay in filing charging documents in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission case was a violation of MLRPC 1.1
  • This Court indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland a lawyer who violated multiple MLRPC, including MLRPC 8.4(c); this Court stated that, although a violation of MLRPC 8.4(c
  • This Court indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Maryland a lawyer who violated multiple MLRPC, including MLRPC 8.4(c); this Court stated that, although a violation of MLRPC 8.4(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.