Attorney Grievance Commission v. Buehler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statutory mandate that custody be awarded to the father did not prohibit court's decision to place the child with its mother
• holding statutory mandate that custody be awarded to the father did not prohibit court’s decision to place the child with its mother
• observing that a child’s best interests outweigh the interests of a parent, even if the parents interest is recognized by statute
• stating that, in a custody dispute, in spite of other considerations, including application of statutory law, “[t]he paramount question was * * * what would be most for the benefit of the infant”
• stating that, in a custody dispute, in spite of other considerations, including applications of statutory law, “[t]he paramount question was * * * what would be most for the benefit of the infant”
• noting “paramount” question in custody dispute is “what would be most for the benefit of the infant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).