Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indefinite suspension with the right to reapply in 60 days was warranted for an attorney neglecting and failing to communicate with three clients
• holding that an indefinite suspension with the right to reapply in 60 days was warranted for an attorney neglecting and failing to communicate with three clients
• finding that an indefinite suspension with the right to reapply in one year was not merited where the attorney did not fail to cooperate with Bar Counsel and did not misappropriate funds
• imposing an indefinite suspension with the right to reapply in 60 days on an attorney for neglecting and failing to communicate with three clients
• imposing a conditional indefinite suspension with the right to apply for reinstatement after 60 days for violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16, and 8.4(d
• imposing a conditional indefinite suspension with the right to apply for reinstatement after 60 days for violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16, and 8.4(d) and accepting as a mitigating factor that the attorney suffered from clinical depression when he violated the MRPC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).