Skip to main content
· 3/10/2003

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Blum

Citations

  • 818 A.2d 219
  • 373 Md. 275
  • 2003 Md. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney’s failure to place unearned fees into an attorney trust account violated Rule 1.15(a)
  • holding that a lawyer who deposited funds from clients into operating and personal accounts prior to “earning” the funds, and consequently used those funds for a “purpose other than the purpose for which” they were entrusted to the lawyer, violated Rule 1.15
  • ordering disbarment for attorney that made multiple misrepresentations in “an attempt to obfuscate the truth and save his own skin”
  • attorney who deposited funds for the purpose of retaining his future services into his personal and operating accounts violated MRPC 1.15(a)
  • “The funds were given to [Respondent] in anticipation of future services, and as such, qualified as ‘trust money’ ....”
  • disbarment is also appropriate when an attorney has made multiple representations in an attempt to obfuscate the truth in order to save him or her self

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.