Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Cohen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that respondent violated Rule 1.3 because of repeated failure to return phone calls from client, among other things
• assessing an indefinite suspension with the right to reapply in six months to an attorney who violated MRPC 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 8.1(a) and 8.4(c) and (d)
• imposing an indefinite suspension with a right to apply after six months for violations of MLRPC 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 8.1(a), and 8.4(c) and (d)
• imposing a sanction of indefinite suspension, with the right to apply for readmission after six months, based on the attorney’s violations of MRPC 1.1,1.3,1.4, 8.1(a), and 8.4(c) and (d
• indefinite suspension with a right to reapply no sooner than six months warranted following attorney's neglect of a client's matter and false representations to Bar Counsel regarding the refund status of unearned fees
• a neglect of client matters, failure to properly communicate with clients, a lack of competence and false statements during disciplinary investigation warranted an indefinite suspension with right to reapply in six months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).