Attorney-General v. Lundy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compliance with filing end date set by New York Toxic Tort Revival Statute, which did not create a waiting period, was “substantive element of the cause of action”
• determining that American Pipe tolling was not applicable to the toxic tort revival statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).