Atterholt v. Herbst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if with proper care [the plaintiff] still had no chance of working in the future, no lost wages are recoverable from the Fund”
• agreeing with Glover that set‐ tlement with provider precluded consideration of causation, but holding that evidence regarding patient=s slim chance of survival even with timely diagnosis was separately admissi‐ ble as to measure of damages
• agreeing with Glover that set‐ tlement with provider precluded consideration of causation, but holding that evidence regarding patient=s slim chance of survival even with timely diagnosis was separately admissi‐ ble as to measure of damages
• agreeing with Glover that set‐ tlement with provider precluded consideration of causation, but holding that evidence regarding patient=s slim chance of survival even with timely diagnosis was separately No. 20‐1437 17 admissible as to measure of damages
• “Recovery of excess damages from the Fund is allowed only after a health care provider or the provider’s insurer has paid the first $250,000, or made a settlement in which the sum of the present cash payment and cost of future periodic payments exceeds $187,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).