Skip to main content
· 9/11/2015

At&T Corp. & Includible Subsidiaries v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 357 Or. 691
  • 358 P.3d 973
  • 2015 Ore. LEXIS 663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing property and payroll factors’, which “estimate the state’s share of responsibility for the income stream by focusing on production” from the sales factor, which “generally tracks the extent to which the taxpayer takes advantage of the taxing state's market”
  • refer- ring to “nowhere income” arising from sale of tangible per- sonal property “when the taxpayer cannot be taxed in the purchaser’s state”
  • “[c]ommentators have routinely criticized [Section 17 of the Uniform Act] for its ambiguity”
  • identifying direct costs of a telephone call

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Landau, Brewer, Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.