· 2/14/2000
At&t Communications Systems, a California Corporation v. Pacific Bell, a California Opinion Corporation
Citations
- 203 F.3d 1183
- 19 Communications Reg. (P&F) 874
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1158
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1657
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1965
- 2000 WL 149410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the regulation promulgated by the FCC merely interprets the substantive provisions of the Act, it does not present retroactivity concerns.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.