Skip to main content
· 2/14/2000

At&t Communications Systems, a California Corporation v. Pacific Bell, a California Opinion Corporation

Citations

  • 203 F.3d 1183
  • 19 Communications Reg. (P&F) 874
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1158
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1657
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1965
  • 2000 WL 149410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the regulation promulgated by the FCC merely interprets the substantive provisions of the Act, it does not present retroactivity concerns.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.