Skip to main content
· 6/20/1995

Atlas Insurance v. Chapman

Citations

  • 888 F. Supp. 742
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8652
  • 1995 WL 375823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a four-month delay was a substantial and material breach of the insurance policy
  • four-month delay was not “as soon as practicable” in accident context when insured did not offer “any excuse or sufficient justification” (citations omitted)
  • 126-day delay in giving notice was a “substantial and material” breach of the notice provision
  • “[W]e hold as a matter of law, that the 126-day delay in complying with the notice provisions in the policy, without any justification, constitutes a substantial and material violation of the insurer’s notice requirement”
  • “[W]e hold as a matter of law, that the 126-day delay in complying with the notice provisions in the policy, without any justification, constitutes a substantial and material violation of the insurer’s notice requirement”
  • same as to 126 days, or about 4 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.