Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, a Corporation v. Madeleine Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg and Cornelis Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg, Her Husband

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We find no basis for the contention that the Court's denial of the tardy demand for a jury was an abuse of its discretion.\
• \We find no basis for the contention that the Court's denial of the tardy demand for a jury was an abuse of its discretion.\
• “We find no basis for the contention that the Court’s denial of the tardy demand for a jury was an abuse of its discretion.”
• “We need not consider the dubious merits of the . . . motion to dismiss, for [it was] not [an] allowable pleading[].”
• “[Rule 71.1’s] prohibition of any pleading other than an answer is clear and unequivocal. The preliminary motions tendered here were unallowable.”
• District court conducted bench trial of all issues, including that of just compensation, after denying jury demand \on the ground that it was untimely and the Court was not disposed to exercise its discretion to waive the procedural default.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).