Atlantic Seaboard Corp. v. Federal Power Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that conflicting marks need to be analyzed in their entirety even when sharing a prominent feature
• “prior use need not be shown by a plaintiff relying on a registered mark unless the defendant counterclaims for cancellation”
• “[P]rior use need not be shown by an opposer relying on a registered mark unless the applicant counterclaims for cancellation.”
• “prior use need not be shown by a plaintiff relying on a registered mark unless the defendant counterclaims for cancellation”
• “prior use need not be shown by a plaintiff relying on a registered mark unless the defendant counterclaims for cancellation”
• “prior use need not be shown by a plaintiff relying on a registered mark unless the defendant counterclaims for cancellation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).