Atlantic Refining Co. v. Fisher
Citations
- 43 Pa. Super. 439
- 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 69
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Sale—Postponement of payment — Estoppel.</p> <p>Where a dealer purchases goods under an agreement that he is not to pay for them until he has used them, and thereafter when urged to pay for the goods asks for a further extension, and promises to pay after a certain period, he cannot after the expiration of such period, allege that he was not to pay for the good's until he had actually used them; his promise to pay on the specified date estops him from setting up the original contract.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Oblady, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.