S.D. New York· 3/25/2009
Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Project Playlist, Inc.
Citations
- 603 F. Supp. 2d 690
- 90 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1799
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24912
- 2009 WL 766224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “this factor is neutral in the Court’s analysis” when neither side has identified an unwilling witness
- finding the locus of operative fact factor was neutral where there are multiple loci of operative fact
- discussing Section 230 congressional intent and outlining cases applying its broad immunity
- considering, on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a website and drawing “facts . . . from the Court's own review of the Website” because “the Website is incorporated by reference into the Complaint” (citing cases where courts likewise have considered such incorporated websites)
- “Because the Website is incorporated by reference into the Complaint, the Court may consider it on a motion to dismiss.”
- “Whether wisely or not, Congress made the legislative judgment to effectively immunize providers of interactive computer services from civil liability in tort with respect to material disseminated by them but created by others.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.S.D. New York· 2012-01-24· cited 126×
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-19· cited 60×
- EasyWeb Innovations, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.E.D. New York· 2012-08-30· cited 60×
- Zaltz v. JDATEE.D. New York· 2013-07-08· cited 46×
- Freeplay Music, LLC v. Gibson Brands, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-07-18· cited 44×
- Goddard v. Google, Inc.N.D. California· 2009-07-30· cited 32×
- Pecorino v. Vutec Corp.E.D. New York· 2012-11-30· cited 24×
- Touchtunes Music Corp. v. Rowe International Corp.S.D. New York· 2009-12-15· cited 22×
- Wu v. Jensen-Lewis Co.S.D. Illinois· 2018-10-30· cited 19×
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, PLC v. Nippon Express USA, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-08-18· cited 16×
- Winter v. American Institute of Medical Sciences & EducationS.D. New York· 2017-03-17· cited 16×
- Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.D. Nevada· 2013-01-25· cited 15×
- Stayart v. YAHOO! INC.E.D. Wisconsin· 2009-08-28· cited 13×
- Saleh v. TillersonS.D. Illinois· 2018-02-26· cited 12×
- Ward v. StewartN.D. New York· 2015-09-29· cited 11×
- Backpage.Com, LLC v. CooperM.D. Tennessee· 2013-01-03· cited 10×
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Escape Media Group, Inc.New York Supreme Court· 2012-07-10· cited 7×
- Milgram v. ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-08-26· cited 5×
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. MySpace, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2009-05-22· cited 3×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Leanspa, LLCD. Connecticut· 2013-01-29· cited 3×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- Patane v. ClarkSecond Circuit· 2007-11-28· cited 1,005×
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 905×
- Iqbal v. HastySecond Circuit· 2007-06-18· cited 613×
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittSecond Circuit· 1996-03-25· cited 568×
- Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 382×
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 319×
- Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1997-11-12· cited 299×
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComNinth Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 279×
- Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanySecond Circuit· 1999-02-10· cited 207×
- Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co. v. America Online Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-03-14· cited 180×
- Pollux Holding Ltd. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Springwell Navigation Corporation v. The Chase Manhattan BankSecond Circuit· 2003-05-01· cited 171×
- Universal Communication Systems, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-02-23· cited 146×
- Barrett v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-11-20· cited 136×
- United States v. Daniel Zane MohrbacherNinth Circuit· 1999-06-29· cited 124×
- Blumenthal v. DrudgeDistrict of Columbia· 1998-04-22· cited 115×
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLCNinth Circuit· 2007-05-31· cited 106×
- Carafano v. Metrosplash.com, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-13· cited 99×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.