Atlantic Coast Line Railway v. Hobbs
Citations
- 71 Fla. 109
- 70 So. 939
- 1916 Fla. LEXIS 483
Syllabus
<p>In an action for damages against a railroad company for injuries sustained by the running of a train, where the plaintiff and defendant were both at fault when the injuries occurred, and the damages were not diminished in proportion to the fault attributable to the plaintiff as required by the statute, a new trial should be awarded.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the testimonies of a Department of Social Services’ income maintenance supervisor and a cost recovery analyst as to Medicaid bills and payment were sufficient proof of moneys expended
- holding that the testimonies of a Department of Social Services’ income maintenance supervisor and a cost recovery analyst as to Medicaid bills and payment were sufficient proof of moneys expended
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cockrell, Reason, Sickness
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.