Skip to main content
· 2/27/1992

Atlanta Casualty Co. v. Fountain

Citations

  • 413 S.E.2d 450
  • 262 Ga. 16
  • 1992 Ga. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “declaratory judgment is not available where a judgment cannot guide and protect the petitioner with regard to some future act”
  • declaratory judgment action proper where insurer’s response to demand letter stated that insurer was unable to determine “whether the policy proved coverage under the circumstances”
  • “[Dleclaratory judgment is not available where a judgment cannot guide and protect the petitioner with regard to some future act — as where an insurance company has already denied a claim.”
  • when a claim for insurance has been made, and a legitimate question exists as to the propriety of denying coverage, the insurance company may file a declaratory judgment action
  • that a demand for payment under the policy has been made; that the insurance company has not yet acted to deny the claim; that legitimate questions exist as to the validity and applicability of the policy provision at issue; and that existing Georgia law does not provide a clear answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Benham, Clarke, Fletcher, Hunt, Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.