· 2/27/1992
Atlanta Casualty Co. v. Fountain
Citations
- 413 S.E.2d 450
- 262 Ga. 16
- 1992 Ga. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “declaratory judgment is not available where a judgment cannot guide and protect the petitioner with regard to some future act”
- declaratory judgment action proper where insurer’s response to demand letter stated that insurer was unable to determine “whether the policy proved coverage under the circumstances”
- “[Dleclaratory judgment is not available where a judgment cannot guide and protect the petitioner with regard to some future act — as where an insurance company has already denied a claim.”
- when a claim for insurance has been made, and a legitimate question exists as to the propriety of denying coverage, the insurance company may file a declaratory judgment action
- that a demand for payment under the policy has been made; that the insurance company has not yet acted to deny the claim; that legitimate questions exist as to the validity and applicability of the policy provision at issue; and that existing Georgia law does not provide a clear answer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Benham, Clarke, Fletcher, Hunt, Weltner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.