Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Florida statute made clear that an offer of UM coverage did not need to be made based upon a material intervening change in an existing policy
• rejecting “material change” standard based on subsequent amendment to Florida statute
• change in named insured from one spouse to another does not require new uninsured motorist insurance rejection even under section (1) of the statute
• new rejection of UM coverage not required when policy originally issued to husband and wife was subsequently renewed after divorce in only one spouse’s name with no change in bodily injury liability limits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).