Atkinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The rule's requirements do not \prohibit absolutely all conversation between or among prospective witnesses. It is only conversation relating to the facts of the case which is proscribed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Del Monte Banana Co. v. Chacon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-02· cited 20×
• Dumas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-09-29· cited 16×
• Johnson v. Canteen Corporation
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-09· cited 7×
• Judd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-28· cited 5×
• Godorov v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-13· cited 3×
• McKinzie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-20· cited 2×
• Showers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-11-29· cited 1×
• Cokely v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-28
• O'Reilly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1893-10-30· cited 250×
• United States v. Carl D. Schaefer
  Seventh Circuit· 1962-03-16· cited 94×
• Mason Braswell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida
  Fifth Circuit· 1972-07-07· cited 89×
• United States v. Buffalo Savings Bank
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-11· cited 66×
• Melvin Andre Taylor, AKA James A. Barker, AKA James Tate v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1967-12-19· cited 48×
• State v. Leong
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1970-02-19· cited 31×
• Rainsberger v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1960-04-06· cited 20×