Atkinson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “unless Orkin’s past conduct is ‘similar’ to the conduct directed at the [plaintiffs], it is inadmissible”
• reversing and remanding punitive damages because the trial court improperly admitted prejudicial evidence
• overruling a 127 to 1 ratio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).