Skip to main content
· 4/2/1993

Atkinson v. Haug

Citations

  • 622 A.2d 983
  • 424 Pa. Super. 406
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1097
  • 1993 WL 94459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Appellant’s subjective belief an attorney/client relationship existed between [the appellant] and [Attorney] Haug is an insufficient basis upon which to find there existed a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.”
  • “Absent an express contract, an implied attorney/client relationship will be found if 1
  • “[W]here an agent acts in his own interest and commits a fraud for his own benefit ... the principal ... will not be held liable for the agent’s tortious act.”
  • “Before a defendant law firm can be held liable for the tortious or negligent conduct of one of its attorneys, it must be established the attorney/employee was acting within the scope of his employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Tamilia, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.