Atkinson v. 2M Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over challenges to “indictments, arrests, prosecutions, convictions, imprisonment, or parole”
• stating that a claim of “common law fraud” sounds in tort
• the Court of Federal Claims “because it is well-settled that jurisdiction over such claims lies exclusively in the district courts.”
• “Likewise,’ this court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ civil rights claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 or 1986 (2000
• “[The Court of Federal Claims] does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ civil rights claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ [sic] 1983, 1985 or 1986 (2000), because it is well-settled that jurisdiction over such claims lies exclusively in the district courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).