Atkins v. USF Dugan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act did not bar claims of IIED and NIED based on the allegation of age discrimination
• finding conduct not extreme or outrageous when employee was told he was “too old and sick” to handle his job and was allegedly terminated in violation of federal and state discrimination laws
• “Consistent with Amos, WOODY V. ACCUQUEST HEARING CTR., LLC 2022-NCCOA-500 Opinion of the Court this Court finds that [the plaintiff]’s assertion of a Title VII claim does not preclude his discharge in violation of public policy cause of action . . . .”
• “Consistent with Amos, WOODY V. ACCUQUEST HEARING CTR., LLC 2022-NCCOA-500 Opinion of the Court this Court finds that [the plaintiff]’s assertion of a Title VII claim does not preclude his discharge in violation of public policy cause of action . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).